This is a mindf**ker of all mindf**kers, to quote John Sebastian at Woodstock. John Edwards, close to the last person of either party I would have pegged, seems to be caught up in a "love child" scandal.
The Drudge Report reported this late Tuesday (but Drudge's developing story has been taken down). In short, The National Enquirer *seems* to be about to break a story on John Edwards having an affair and now, apparently impregnating his paramour, who has either come forth, or whose friends have now leaked (or sold!) the story to the National Enquirer. Sure, it is a P.O.S. periodical, but on the other hand, they have broken a lot of real scandal news (along with Matt Drudge) over the last few years.
The story, as I understand it, will appear in the National Enquirer print edition (and their website) tomorrow. It seems to have appeared earlier today on Drudge, but I can't tell, since their story, too, is now a dead link.
Drudge now has a link that goes to a dead Enquirer page. If Matt Drudge has backed off from the story, he was either hectored with the threat of a King-hell lawsuit, or he had doubts about the story himself. And if Matt Drudge has doubts about the story, it has to be pretty flimsy.
According to ogpaper.com: "The National Enquirer is brewing the latest political scandal, John Edwards accused of having a love child."
"The National Enquirer is like an alligator - once the jaws lock, there is no way out. Earlier this year the NE reported on John Edwards and his affair with an unnamed woman from his campaign (follow the links below to read that story). Now, the latest John Edwards scandal - a love child. According to reports, the John Edwards love child scandal will run as part of the front cover of the National Enquirer on Wednesday, the picture was found on the Drudge Report. According to the cover, a woman is pregnant with John Edwards baby and is hiding. The story has not been confirmed or denied by the National Enquirer yet, watch for the magazine tomorrow and keep an eye on further developments in the John Edwards love child scandal. "
I did snag the bitmap above online, but have no way to determine its veracity in this paucity of information. It may be a spoof, or a mockup, or the real thing, of tomorrow's National Enquirer.
You may remember, I always thought both John Edwards and Mitt Romney would surge ahead from their positions at 3rd place, or further back, in the pack. If these allegations have even a whiff of authenticity, we can expect John Edwards to bail out of this race like he was hopping in the first lifeboat off the Titantic. John may have been able to weather this one had it just been another tawdry affair. But Ex-Senator Edwards happens to be married to probably the best-loved spouse among all the G.O.P. and Democratic candidates (except for maybe Bill Clinton), who also happens to have incurable breast cancer. If he is guilty, he, naturally, deserves every bit of ignominy that has been and will be heaped, upon him. If he is just a victim of rumor mongering (as was his running mate John Kerry...remember the stories of the young woman he had a tempestuous affair with? They all turned out to be false), well, then, long may he run! I did support him for President previously, but not this time around, although I would have supported him had he become viable (which so far in this race, he never really has).
If you did have this affair, well then drop out ASAP John, and give a decent guy like Joe Biden a chance! And if you did have the affair, well, then you are a sub-human piece of dogsh*t, and I am embarrassed that I supported you in 200o and 2004.
---o0o---
4 comments:
Whoa, Jackie, I don't remember anything like this kind of vitriol from you for Bubba's antics. BTW, enquiring minds want to know, who figured less likely than John Edwards on your list of candidates least likely to commit adultery? Heck, why not post the list in descending order from chaste to centurion.
Bubba was the President. His wife wasn't terminal (in the strict sense of the word). And I don't recall him sermonizing or lecturing us. Least likely candidates to be caught in the same imbroglio: Mitt, Huck, Dennis K, and probably John McCain (I mean, in his case, he might, but the Mrs. probably keeps him close to home)...
This just pissed me off. What can I say. That earnest morality of his...
Ah, presidential infallibility. And, you're at least half right, Clinton had surrogates lecture us. Anyway, give us the whole list top to bottom. I expect, given your frequent postings, that you would consider Fred's call to fidelity to be at least as strong as Huck's though for entirely secular reasons, yes?
Another thought on Bubba. Didn't he leave a trail of unhappy pair-a-mores behind him on his campaigns through the trailers of Arkansas and the nation before he got to the Oval Ofc?
Post a Comment